Re: [xml-dev] Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors

>>>>> "Miles" == Miles Sabin <> writes:

    Miles> Fair enough. But just how "new" is that new ASN.1 code? If
    Miles> it was completely original code with no borrowings from
    Miles> SSLeay and still reproduced the same or very similar bugs,
    Miles> and those bugs were intrinsically related to ASN.1 rather
    Miles> than being, eg., generic integer overflows, then that'd be
    Miles> good evidence that there was a general problem with ASN.1.

Or related the the language used...

-- 
Regards,

Berend. (-: