Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?)

From
Tim Bray <>
To
Claude Seyrat <>
Date
2003-08-07T20:10:01Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?)
Claude Seyrat wrote:

>  Be sure, that there are many
> patents
> that can be applied on W3C standards, ASN-1 and others. MPEG is not worst
> or better wrt to patents and it is clear wrt to royalties:

With the W3C, you can assume that the people who wrote the standard 
didn't build in a requirement to use their own proprietary IP, and made 
an effort to produce work that is as unencumbered as possible.  As Len 
points out, this is not a guaranteed promise that you won't get into 
trouble, but it is substantially better than nothing.

Thus your assertion that they're all the same is wrong.
-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)