RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

From
Simon St.Laurent <>
To
Date
2003-06-20T18:39:47Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
At 10:42 AM 6/20/2003 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Are the W3C implementations *reference* implementations
>or *sample* implementations?  IOW, how is the implementation
>tied to the specification in terms of features and proof
>of conforming and compliant implementation?  Are any public source?
>Are they tied normatively to the spec or informatively?

This information is not public, certainly not a spec-by-spec basis.

 From what I can gather, different Working Groups appear to have very 
different criteria, but few of them take the time to explain the criteria, 
at least in public.