Jonathan Robie scripsit:
> Two (DTDs and W3C XML Schema) is already awkward. Three would be more
> awkward, but I think it *would* make sense for the W3C to specify a third
> schema language: a simple, well designed language that used the same types
> as W3C XML Schema.
ISO/IEC 19757:2 by any other name would smell as sweet.
> But I would only support it if it had a prayer of being implemented and
> used.
It has been.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
--_The Hobbit_
