Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] Is SAF dead?

From
Eric van der Vlist <>
To
Date
2003-01-27T18:41:23Z
ID
<1043692883.1862.107.camel@ibook>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Is SAF dead?
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 19:36, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> At 10:55 AM 1/27/2003 +0100, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >When I have I asked about SAF [1] a year ago, SAF seemed to be still
> >pursuing some kind of underground progression.
> >
> >[1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200202/msg00153.html
> 
> Well, it progressed, then it seemed to have stopped entirely (I can't give 
> details). But when I checked up on this today, there seems to be some 
> indication that it may rise again.

Sounds like good news!

> >Can someone tell be if it's still the case and if there are any project
> >or interest to defining SAF in relation with Relax NG schemas?
> 
> I think it would be a natural fit.

I'll mention it in my RNG book then.

Thanks

Eric

> Jonathan 
-- 
Have you ever thought about unit testing XSLT templates?
                                                     http://xsltunit.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next in thread → Next in month →