RE: [xml-dev] XML and ConciseXML
wrote: >Isn't there anyone out there who thinks it >is ridiculous to have a syntax that uses >126 characters to express an integer? Yes, the person who made this particular bit of markup probably shouldn't have.
wrote: >Isn't there anyone out there who thinks it >is ridiculous to have a syntax that uses >126 characters to express an integer? Yes, the person who made this particular bit of markup probably shouldn't have.