K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:
> Of course we did. All I was saying was that "view source" is no
> substitute for "read DTD".
On the contrary. View Source is essential. Read DTD is nice-to-have.
And for something reasonably complex, like for example DocBook or HTML,
in my experience it's *easier* to learn by View Source. Anyhow, I'd
rather have a program read the DTD for me and tell me where I got the
instance wrong. Reading moderately-complex DTDs with lots of parameter
entities can be immensely difficult. -Tim
