Re: [xml-dev] equivalentTo vs. XSLT

Miles Sabin wrote:
>...
> Not quite. I'm saying that vocabulary to vocabulary mappings can be 
> expressed in XSLT as well as in OWL, and I'm suggesting that for many 
> practical purposes XSLT is likely to be a better bet.

I don't think that anybody is claiming that OWL should replace XSLT. 
Rather that OWL is better when OWL's features are a better fit and XSLT 
is better in the opposite situation. We've talked at length about the 
strengths and weaknesses of both already.

  Paul Prescod