Re: [xml-dev] XML/RDF

Miles Sabin wrote:
> ...
> 
> I prefer the other option too.
> 
> But it's not clear to me what this has to do with RDF or DAML. Once 
> you've defined a mapping between the vocabularies (and if you want to 
> get fancy, between the choreographies too), and what useful job is 
> there left for assertions and reasoners to do?

I would define the mapping _as_ a RDF/DAML(OWL) assertion using DAML's 
(OWL's) equivalentTo relationship.

  Paul Prescod