Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)

From
Thomas B. Passin <>
To
xml-dev <>
Date
2002-10-23T13:00:45Z
ID
<001601c27a94$339c1250$fe193044@tbp1>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XML as "passive data" (Re: [xml-dev] The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
[<>]
>
> But seriously, I acknowledge the need for an object serialization
> format that works for interchange.  My current dismay arises at least
> partially from finding XML a poor fit for this function.

Right, XML was not developed particularly for that purpose and it can be
awkward to use it thusly.

Cheers,

Tom P