Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
Norman,
Thanks for the reply and clarification, even if it was qualified as a personal viewpoint only. :)
In a message dated 18/10/2002 11:43:13 GMT Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
Hm ... I wonder if that would be long enough for the W3C XML Schema WG to clarify the spec for the community? <grin/>
Maybe WGs should be forbidden from embedding their "new science" into other specs for at least that long.
Andrew Watt
Thanks for the reply and clarification, even if it was qualified as a personal viewpoint only. :)
In a message dated 18/10/2002 11:43:13 GMT Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
(Personally, I think WGs should be forbidden from doing any work
except clarifications and errata on a V1.0 spec for at least 365
consecutive days.)
Hm ... I wonder if that would be long enough for the W3C XML Schema WG to clarify the spec for the community? <grin/>
Maybe WGs should be forbidden from embedding their "new science" into other specs for at least that long.
Andrew Watt