Hi,
'It is too bad that the SVG world is so dependent on a single
closed-source implementation.'
Have a look at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/SVG-Implementations.htm8
There is clearly more then the Adobe SVG viewer.
Gert
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Prescod [mailto:]
Sent: donderdag 17 oktober 2002 16:25
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and
XForms?)
wrote:
> In a message dated 17/10/2002 09:55:05 GMT Daylight Time,
> writes:
>
>
>
>>The situation as I see it is more like MS has found a convinience in
>>Adobe implementing the standard in IE for them.
>
>
> Manos,
>
> The practical problem for users of SVG is that Adobe speedily
implemented
> *most* of SVG 1.0 in the Adobe SVG Viewer then, more or less, **just
> stopped** development. Different SVG developers are affected
differently by
> different omissions.
>
> There is certainly most of the functionality present in ASV version 3
but it
> would be really nice to have a complete SVG 1.0 implementation.
It is too bad that the SVG world is so dependent on a single
closed-source implementation. It would be more healthy if there were an
active community around another native implementation like the one
embedded in Mozilla.
Paul Prescod
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
