RE: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup

From
Bill de hÓra <>
To
'Rick Jelliffe' <>,
Date
2002-10-11T09:04:48Z
ID
<000201c27105$52d8cbb0$1fc8c8c8@mitchum>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] The Knights of Tag Soup
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:] 
>
> From: "Mike Champion" <>
> 
> > I'm under the impression that managing schema evolution
> > is a Hard Problem; lots of the complexity
> > of WXS is there to make the problem more manageable by employing 
> > notions of partial re-use that come from the OO world, but it's
> > not clear to me that best practices have emerged for using it. 
> 
> Hard Problems are often merely inadequately analysed 
> problems. For example, why should we expect that "Schema 
> evolution" can be be solved by a single mechanism? [...]

Sounds like WXS could use a (drumroll... tada!) meta-object protocol.

See: http://www2.parc.com/csl/groups/sda/projects/mops/

but then it wouldn't be WXS anymore...

Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

OT Java factoid: Gregor Kiczales is working in a Java JSR to allow
metadata  annotations to Java elements. Given his work in Common Lisp
and its meta-object protocol and Aspect oriented programming, what falls
out of that JSR might be very interesting:
<http://www.jcp.org/jsr/detail/175.jsp>.

Slightly less OT java factoid: this JSR for web services metadata builds
the above: <http://www.jcp.org/jsr/detail/181.jsp>