>
> BTW, have you noticed that yet another XML spec is defining a non XML
> syntax?
>
> http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/ltm-1.3-prop.html
See also:
http://www.gooseworks.org/l1.html
for the L1 syntax that represents topic map graphs.
XML is great, I would never trash it, but it doesn't meet all
requirements. I see the emergence of little languages developed by markup
people as a very encouraging, grass roots sign.
Patrick Durusau's work on JITTs shoudl culiminate in the rehabilitation of
datatag and short references (little languages that parse!) and the LMNL
people seem to be playing in an overlapping space.
Content = data + markup as ever -- it's just that outside the marketing
departments and the committees the notion of what "markup" means is
becoming a lot more flexible.
Sam Hunting
eTopicality, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Turn your searching experience into a finding experience."(tm)
Topic map consulting and training: www.etopicality.com
Free open source topic map tools: www.gooseworks.org
XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web.
Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
