> From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:00 AM
> To: Julian Reschke;
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer
>
>
> At 3:01 PM +0100 10/27/02, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> >IMHO: it can be a resource without an URI actually been assigned
> to it. The
> >essential thing is that you *could* assign that URI.
>
> OK. That makes some sense. What do you mean by the word "could"? Doie
> sit require that we could use existing schemes and syntaxes to assign
> a URI? or merely that such a scheme is conceivable?
IMHO: the latter. Such as
after-x-include:(escapedURI)
> For example, in an analogous situation, would it be OK to consider a
> particular group of frames with particular documents in each frame a
> resource, even though there's not as yet any URI that can point to
> them? (I'm thinking pre-XFrames here.)
I think so. For instance, it shouldn't be hard to come up with a URI scheme
that would describe the individual frames and their relationship.
--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
