Re: [xml-dev] Are XML's Good Ideas hidden? (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: What are Sc...
In a message dated 26/10/2002 21:46:20 GMT Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
Simon,
Just for clarity are you saying that, on reflection, you consider that "XML really is simple"?
Andrew Watt
>Is is all over now, or is there some way to get out the word that XML really
>*is* simple and useful without all the layers and layers of hype, complexity,
>and drag-n-drop tools that exploit the power of XML for the benefit of
>vendors while denying its benefits to users?
I've been trying to do that for years, through books and mailing lists,
with a sprinkling of code along the way.
Simon,
Just for clarity are you saying that, on reflection, you consider that "XML really is simple"?
Andrew Watt