Re: [xml-dev] We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> Well, that's one of the tricky points. It is *not* a well-formedness 
> error for an XML 1.0 document to label itself version="1.1", 
> version="2.0", or version="mauve". This is neither a violation of the 
> BNF grammar nor any well-formedness constraint in the XML 1.0 spec. 

Read the errata page.

-- 
John Cowan                                <>     
http://www.reutershealth.com              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"