RE: [xml-dev] InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)

From
Bill de hÓra <>
To
'Elliotte Rusty Harold' <>,
Date
2002-09-23T17:16:04Z
ID
<000001c26324$f84a0c10$1fc8c8c8@mitchum>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
> From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:] 
>
> I can't say I find the collections API to be incredibly consistent 
> about return types. When we arguing similar points in JDOM, I noticed 
> that all sides of the debate could find justification for their 
> position somewhere in the Collections API. :-)

Indeed. Three options, pick one. Though I'm still of the mind that the
JavaBeans idiom is not the right one for manipulating trees; getting and
setting fields on an object, sure.


Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com