Thanks for the idea.
I switched *from* a type derived from xsd:string to CDATA because the
chunk of data that goes there can have 0x09, 0x0D and 0x0A characters in
it.
</pff>
-----Original Message-----
From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Phil Fuhlman;
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] what is correct way to express a type as CDATA in
XML schema
Use xsd:string
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Fuhlman [mailto:]
Sent: Mon 9/9/2002 10:19 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: [xml-dev] what is correct way to express a type as
CDATA in XML schema
MSXML4 fails on following (error: " undeclared XSD type: 'CDATA'
"):
<xsd:complexType name="AClass">
<xsd:all>
<xsd:element name="Value" type="CDATA"
minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1" />
</xsd:all>
</xsd:complexType>
I checked through the schema[0-2] docs at http:\\www.w3c.org (as
best I
could ;) ) but did not see any obvious example / discussion of
how to
use CDATA as a 'type' in a schema. From examples I perceived
that CDATA
might be an 'intrinsic' type, hence the above syntax, but it
does not
work.
Any ideas?
</pff>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>,
an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
