Hi,
Hoops I forgot to include XSL-FO as some clever members has mentioned.
Updated news about the Bizantine Schism:
a) using Xlink or allowing its uses as defined in the specs: 2 (SVG,
MathML)
b) not using it: 3 (XHTML, XForm, SMIL, XSL-FO)
Note: XSL_FO specifications (Oct 15 2001) where published after the
xlink recommendation (June 27 2001).
Question: Is there any integration or consistency checking process in
W3C. If not, we may have the explanation. Even if a lot of brilliant
people are active participant to the W3C WG, if wrong processes are
used, wrong results occurs. I may have the best wood to make the best
furniture and still get garbage if I use a mini mill manufacture to
produce the them. If W3C has such consistency checking mechanism can I
say WAKE UP! :-)
Cheers
Didier PH Martin
