Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms

Arjun Ray wrote:
> Erik Wilde <> wrote:
> | i do see the danger of enccouraging people to use non-xlink 1.0 
> | syntaxes with this strategy, and please don't bring up the 'how do 
> | i recognize xlink syntax' debate again. 
> On what basis could one conclude that some syntax is *non*-xlink?
>   "You're using non-xlink syntax!"
>   "Er... how so?"
>   "Don't argue with me!  You're using non-xlink syntax, I tell you!"
> Okay.

even easier than that:

"look into the xlink 1.0 spec"