6/29/02 10:31:19 AM, "Simon St.Laurent" <> wrote:
>I think RELAX NG's non-XML syntax works because the model in RELAX NG works
>pretty simply. I have a very very hard time picturing a non-XML syntax for
>W3C XML Schema, and I'm not sure that it would be any more readable or
>workable than the XML syntax.
>
>I'd love to be proven wrong on that one.
Possibly aside the point, but I personally find it rather annoying that just about all the examples
I've seen of XSD syntax use fully-prefixed elements names, despite the fact that none of the elements
are outside the XSD namespace. I guess it reminds me too much of MS-Hungarian notation, which I also
personall find unreadable.
