Marcus Carr <> wrote:
| I'm thinking more about the possibility of normalising documents that have
| been marked up to a point, but that are not completly well-formed. That form
| of tag omission has long been a powerful tool in a real-world scenario.
This is the point of "amply-tagged" in the WebSGML TC (See K.2.2.4):
http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/sc34/document/0029.htm
| Yes, [PEs are] a pain if they're used badly. If more people were less lazy
| about analysis, we'd probably see a lot less of them, but that hasn't changed
| yet...
PEs need to die. Killing them off, however, needs additions to DTD syntax
to cover the situations for which to date PEs have been used as kludges.
