I apologise if this came off as arrogant or impolite.
I accessed the URL from work by clicking a link on the public XML Schema comments page[0] which also provides the same link that I provided. However, I was at work where my machine is configured to allow me access to W3C member-only lists transparently and didn't realize that although the link was provided on a public page it led to a members-only page.
I assure you, that from now on I'll make sure to test my links by trying them from home before posting them to XML-DEV.
Thanks for pointing this out.
[0] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments#pfiur-type
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Jacobi [mailto:]
Sent: Mon 3/25/2002 12:53 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo;
Cc:
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
Dare,
It is arrogant and inpolite to say may "more info at" citing
a password protected page.
> As I mentioned previously, the seemingly contradictory dual nature of the
> ur-type is a known issue in the spec which has been addressed.
>
> More info at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jan/0065.html
