Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft

Rick Jelliffe wrote:


> No. 0x0085 is not AFAIK a character in ISO 8859-1 (it is one of the design principles
> of 8859-1 that it will not fail on systems that mask the 8th bit and look for control
> characters).


In one sense that is correct.  However, the character encoding scheme
labeled "ISO 8859-1" includes both the C0 and the C1 character sets.
Check the mapping tables at http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859 .

-- 
Not to perambulate             || John Cowan <>
    the corridors               || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose     || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    in the boots of ascension.  \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel