Jonathan Borden wrote:
> Eric van der Vlist wrote:
>>The problem seems to be that this TEXT doesn't enter into the definition
>>of text made in XML 1.0, but it should be possible to represent it
>>differently using what we have at hand.
>>
>
> Isn't that what character references are for? You already need to escape
> characters such as single and/or double quotes, < & etc, so adding a
> few numbers to a case statement doesn't seem to be a huge deal.
Not really. The character references are equivalent to the characters
which they replace and thus it seems difficult to use them to replace
characters which are forbidden...
Eric
--
Rendez-vous a Paris pour les Electronic Business Days 2002.
http://www.edifrance.org/ebd/index.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
