Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1

From
Elliotte Rusty Harold <>
To
Date
2001-12-19T13:44:47Z
ID
<p04330103b84649c4dcec@[192.168.254.4]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
At 11:20 AM +0000 12/19/01, Richard Tobin wrote:
>In article <p04330100b84390db8f06@[192.168.254.4]> you write:
>>No, Emacs most certainly does accept all three line ending
>>conventions.
>
>This depends on the version of Emacs.  Probably the newest ones do.
>But Emacs could certainly be easily changed to accept NEL too, if
>anyone cared.  If people started receiving XML files with NEL in them,
>it probably would be changed.
>

In case it matters I ran my tests on

GNU Emacs 20.7.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu, X toolkit)
  of Thu Aug 24 2000 on porky.devel.redhat.com

I'm not sure how long emacs has had this feature. I do remember that 
10 years ago I routinely swapped files between emacs on SunOS and 
various editors on my Mac and didn't worry in the least about line 
ending conventions. It just worked.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold |  | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+