Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft)

From
Rick Jelliffe <>
To
Date
2001-12-16T02:19:14Z
ID
<003701c18607$802424f0$>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft)
From: "Michael Kay" <>
 > The fact that most of the world adopted the UNIX-style file model rather
> than the mainframe style is a historical accident that doesn't make either
> style wrong, let alone "brain-dead". I don't know whether it's right now
> that XML should make accommodations for this minority of the IT community,
> but it's certainly a reasonable proposition to argue.

Interestingly, SGML uses the Record Start, Record End approach.

XML threw this out, in favour of the more Webby newline approach:
"map to #A".

The fact that IBM uses NEL for newlines may be a good enough
reason for adding NEL to the list of characters to map to #A,
but does not mean that XML 1.0's decision to support lines rather
than records needs to be revisited.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
Next in thread → Next in month →