Hi
Enda,
I
blocked all of the possible meeting times you have
mentioned.
So any
of them should work for me.
What
about adding two issues mentioned in mail
(namely comtemplating about keeping spec and schema
in
lockstep, and deciding on how to set up our 'seed'
schema)?
Presumably, a word about how we may want to organize
the
actual work on a schema would also be helpful.
Best,
Christian
-----Original Message-----
From: Enda McDonnell
[mailto:]
Sent: Montag, 11. Februar 2002
14:53
To: ''
Subject:
[xliff-schemas] First conf call...
Hi
guys,
Today I will
organise a meeting for Wednesday at 4pm GMT. Let me know immediately if
that time suits. If we hold the meeting on Wed, it will be possible to do
some follow up work before next Tuesday's xliff meeting. Can you let me
know about your availability on Thurs at 4pm and Fri at 4pm incase any can't
make it.
Call details will
follow.
I propose the
following simple agenda for the first meeting.
Agenda
1.
Adopt Charter - Agree on a charter
for the sup group.
2. Adopt
Schema Dialect - Agree the dialect to be used for xliff
specification.
3. Adopt and Agenda - Agree a set of
topics that this group will address.
4. AOB - Any other issues.
Pre Meeting Mail Discussion
The following is by
way of generating some discussion on the issues to be finalised at the
meetings. I think it would be great if the conf calls were geared toward
finally agreeing stuff we have discussed already via
email.
1. Suggested Charter
The following is a
suggested charter or mission statement, anyone agree /
disagree?
"The purpose of the
xliff-schemas group is to decide what schema dialect to use in defining the
xLiff specification. The group should also decide on the source format for
the schema. It is also the work of this group to produce the schemas for
the specification as it evolve.
This group will make
proposals on its work to the xliff technical committee for final
approval."
2. Dialects
<David> My
understanding is that the main TC has limited the scope of this subcom to
working only on W3CSchema </David>
<Enda> I did
not take this from the meetings we had. Correct me if I am wrong, but I
think this is one of the main purpose of this sub group. Should we deem
another schema to be more suitable, or decide to publish the specification in a
number of schemas, that should be our proposal to the main
TC.</Enda>
3. Work Agenda
Source
format?
Producing Schema as specification evolves?
Other
topics?
4. AOB
Thanks
Christian for the mail on comparing schemas. It made for interesting
reading.
Best
regards,
Enda
Alchemy Software
Development Ltd.
Harcourt Business
Centre
Block
2
Harcourt
Street
Dublin
2
Ireland
Tel : (353)-1-708
2800
Fax : (353)-1-708
2801
Web : www.AlchemySoftware.ie
Breathe
Fire into your
Localization
Workflow
