Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [xacml] The Result object of a XACML JSON Response
No I didn't. I don't think it makes sense. On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 6:17 PM Steven Legg <> wrote: Hi David, Did you intend the Response member to be optional? If not then I will make it a mandatory array. Regards, Steven On 8/06/2018 10:19 PM, David Brossard wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Our implementation behaves the same way: single object for single decision. Array otherwise. I also concur that in the next version, only array will be allowed. > > When we have gone through the following version, I will update the swagger I wrote. I would love to have it as a formal means to describe the profile. > > David > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Steven Legg < <mailto:>> wrote: > > > Hi David, > > On 8/06/2018 12:52 AM, David Brossard wrote: > > Hi Steven, all > > I am trying to get to the bottom of an issue with the JSON profile. Given you have looked at it extensively more recently than I have, I thought you might know the answer off the top of your mind. > > In section 5.2.1 <http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/xacml-json-http/v1.0/cos01/xacml-json-http-v1.0-cos01.html#_Toc497727092 <http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/xacml-json-http/v1.0/cos01/xacml-json-http-v1.0-cos01.html#_Toc497727092>> of the current spec, I wrote: > > The Responseproperty MAY contain an array of Resultobjects. > > What I am trying to figure out is whether there is anything in the spec that allows the Response object to be the single Result object. > > > There wasn't anything that explicitly allowed it to be a single object, but the > MAY made the array optional. So if it's optional then what is it otherwise? Maybe > a single object! > > Or was the MAY saying that the Response member is optional? I made the Response > member optional in the latest draft on that assumption, though in practice it > isn't because there has to be at least one result in the XML representation. If > you didn't intend to make, or have a reason for making, the Response member > optional then we should make it mandatory. > > I know we are moving away from this behavior anyway. But if I did write that, then this would be a potentially bigger change than previously thought. > > > The ViewDS implementation is accepting a single object or an array and sending > a single object when there is only one result. It will soon change to always > sending an array. > > Regards, > Steven > > > > -- > David Brossard > Web: http://www.axiomatics.com <http://www.axiomatics.com/> > Axiomatics Blog <http://www.axiomatics.com/blog/ <http://www.axiomatics.com/blog/>> | Events <http://www.axiomatics.com/events.html <http://www.axiomatics.com/events.html>> | Resources, Webinars & Whitepapers <http://www.axiomatics.com/resources.html <http://www.axiomatics.com/resources.html>> > Connect with us on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/companies/536082 <http://www.linkedin.com/companies/536082>> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/axiomatics> | Google + <https://plus.google.com/u/1/b/101496487994084529291/ <https://plus.google.com/u/1/b/101496487994084529291/>> | Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/axiomatics <https://www.facebook.com/axiomatics>> | YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/user/axiomaticsab <http://www.youtube.com/user/axiomaticsab>> | Stackoverflow <https://stackoverflow.com/users/1021725/david-brossard <https://stackoverflow.com/users/1021725/david-brossard>> > > > > > > > -- > David Brossard > VP of Customer Relations > +1 312 774-9163 > +1 502 922 6538 > +46(0)760 25 85 75 > > Axiomatics | 525 W. Monroe Suite 2310 | Chicago 60661 <https://maps.google.com/?q=525+W.+Monroe+Suite+2310+%7C+Chicago+60661&entry=gmail&source=g> > Support: https://support.axiomatics.com <https://support.axiomatics.com/> > Web: http://www.axiomatics.com <http://www.axiomatics.com/> > Axiomatics Blog <http://www.axiomatics.com/blog/> | Events <http://www.axiomatics.com/events.html> | Resources, Webinars & Whitepapers <http://www.axiomatics.com/resources.html> > Connect with us on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/companies/536082> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/axiomatics> | Google + <https://plus.google.com/u/1/b/101496487994084529291/> | Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/axiomatics> | YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/user/axiomaticsab> | Stackoverflow <https://stackoverflow.com/users/1021725/david-brossard> >
Next in thread →
Next in month →