Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [xacml] Obligation and Advice handling in case of indeterminates
Hi Jan,
There are some discussions on this in the mailing list archives.
Basically, an Indeterminate means that an error has happened and
the PDP cannot figure out what the decision should be. In light of
that, it is a bit of a contradiction in terms that the PDP still
would calculate what obligations goes with the decision.
I guess it might be possible to extend the model, but I think it
would be entering into suspect territory to do so, with possible
unintended consequences.
Best regards,
Erik
On 2012-08-10 12:38, Herrmann, Jan wrote:
Hi all,
Regarding Obligation and
Advice handling in case of indeterminates the spec says the
following:
“…As a consequence of
this procedure, no
obligations or advice
SHALL be returned to the
PEP if the rule,
policies, or policy sets from which they
are drawn are not evaluated, or if their evaluated result is
"Indeterminate" or "NotApplicable", or if the
decision resulting from
evaluating the
rule, policy, or
policy set does not match the decision resulting from
evaluating an enclosing
policy set.”
I encountered differen
use cases were this constraint led to several limitations.
Why did we define this constraint. Is it explicitly
required? What if obligations get dischared in an obligation
handler called by the context handler and not by the pep.
What I would need is the option return obligations even if
some indeterminate occurs.
Thanks upfront for your
thoughts on this issue.
Best regards
Jan
With best regards,
Jan Herrmann
Siemens AG
Corporate Technology
Corporate Research and Technologies
CT RTC ITS SEA
Otto-Hahn-Ring 6
81739 Munich, Germany
Tel.: +49 89 636-40612
mailto:
Next in thread →
Next in month →