RE: [xacml] RE: Hierarchical actions

Paul,


From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Tyson, Paul H
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:26 PM
To: Sinnema, Remon; 
Subject: RE: [xacml] RE: Hierarchical actions

> > "Do people on the TC feel that this is something worth standardizing in a profile?"
> 
> If you mean a general approach for dealing with ontologies and semantic web technologies, I agree.

Yes, that's what I mean. My current use case of hierarchical actions could be one example.


>> I have over the past two years mentioned  some possibilities in this direction.  If XACML is to remain a viable choice for implementing and executing rules, it must provide a standardized semantic web aspect of some sort.  See my preliminary thoughts at http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xacml/XACMLandRDF. <<

Interesting stuff. I will start a new mail thread with some questions I have about it.


Thanks,
Ray