← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [xacml] Minutes for 26 May TC Meeting - UPDATED - clarificationson new issues

From
rich levinson <>
Date
2011-05-30T02:42:04+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml] Minutes for 26 May TC Meeting - UPDATED - clarificationson new issues
I. Roll Call
 Voting Members
  Hal Lockhart (Chair)
  Bill Parducci (Co-Chair, minutes)
  Paul Tyson
  Doron Grinstein
  Remon Sinnema
  Anthony Nadalin
  Rich Levinson
  Hal Lockhart
  John Tolbert

 Member
|  David Broussard

 Quorum NOT met: (47% per Kavi)

I. Roll Call & Approve Minutes:
 Minutes
  NO vote on minutes for 19 May 2011 TC Meeting

II. Administrivia
  Hal noted that he will request at that next call we move back to 
  biweekly calls.

 XACML 3.0 core wd 20 uploaded
  The TC is encouraged to review.

 F2F
  Hal will create a poll to gather the final attendance count for the 
  F2F.

III. Issues Discussed
 PDP REST Interface (PAP)
  Hal noted that the current thinking on the list attribute
  information would be in JSON and transported using a POST over HTTP
  with the response. He offered that he personally would like to see
  this done in such a way that doesn't cap the functionality. 

  David Chadwick concurs with this and noted that his current
  prototype doesn't cover Multiple Resources, but that this isn't part
  of the Core spec. 

  Paul pointed out that the W3C is working to develop standardized
  mechanisms for expressing RDF graphs and that XACML fits within the
  scope of this work. Therefore the TC should consider building upon
  that work. Alternatively, he offered that a "bridge" between XACML
  and the W3C work may be developed.

  Hal countered that direct association with the concept of "Semantic
  Web" work may defeat the underlying driver for this project 
  (enhanced approachability of XACML).

  Paul noted that he is not against any efforts to make XACML more
  approachable in HTTP based environments.

 XACML Implementers Guide
  Rich reviewed his position on the ramifications of how the current 
  direction on extended Indeterminate response and what it may mean to
  new adopters. This lead to the revival of the Adopters Guide. Rich
  asked that the TC consider adding/updating content to the guide as
  for changes to the spec/Profiles that have been added since the 
  guide 

IV. New Issue
 Permit|Deny Bias PDPs & Extended Indeterminate
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread