Re: [xacml] Revised proposal for issue #11, using XPath/URI pathexpressions

From
Rich.Levinson <>
Date
2009-11-25T18:23:20+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml] Revised proposal for issue #11, using XPath/URI pathexpressions
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [xacml] Revised proposal for issue #11, using XPath/URI path expressions
Date: 	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:37:34 +0100
From: 	Erik Rissanen <>
To: 	Rich.Levinson <>
CC: 	xacml <>
References: 	"><> "><> "><> "><> "><>


Hi Rich,

Thanks for the clarification. I thought you said that the same attribute 
values (and thus the same request) could be used directly for both 
schemes without modification.

But what you actually say is that the same fragment can be reused as a 
piece to implement either scheme, though separately. I would agree with 
that.

Best regards,
Erik