XACML 3.0 Public Review specs

... are out the door, but please note the following:
1. I updated the cover pages.
2. I deleted names listed in Acknowledgements that are no longer members of the TC.
3. References to OASIS work in the references section does not conform to our template. I didn't change them, but they must be updated before the next cycle.
--The proper format for a citation to an OASIS Technical Committee's work (whether Normative or Non-Normative) is:OASIS

Stage (Committee Draft 01, Committee Draft 02, Committee Specifcation 01, etc. or Standard)

Title (italicized or in quotation marks)

Approval Date (Month YYYY)

URI of the actual Authoritative Specification (namespace is not acceptable as the content changes over time)For example: [EDXL-HAVE] OASIS Standard, "Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 1.0", November 2008.

  http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-have/os/emergency_edxl_have-1.0-spec-os.doc--
4. I didn't catch it until the end, but Hal's email address still lists BEA. Please make sure all any/all email addresses are up-to-date.
5. Before resubmitting the specs (whether for another PR round or CS vote) please make sure you update the acknowledgements per the TC Process. 
A specification that is approved by the TC at any level must include a list of people who
    participated in the development of the specification. This list shall be initially compiled by the
    Chair, and any Member of the TC may add or remove their names from the list by request.
Regards,
Mary
 Mary P McRaeDirector, Standards DevelopmentTechnical Committee AdministratorOASIS: Advancing open standards for the information societyemail:  web: www.oasis-open.orgtwitter: fiberartisan  #oasisopenphone: 1.603.232.9090
Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.