Re: [xacml] Summary of what I think I said on the call about thehierarchical profile

Hi Rich,

See my previous email for an explanation why it will not be possible to
define the profile in terms of multiple hierarchies. We must have a
single consistent hierarchy to work on. The 2.0 profile talks about
multiple parents, so it works on a DAG or forest in addition to a plain
tree.

Anyway, I've completely lost track of the various proposals for how to
proceed with the profile text. :-) Maybe it's time for a new working
draft after today's call? It would be so much easier to talk about a
specific document, rather than lots of "imaginary" proposals from
several people. :-)

Regards,
Erik

Rich.Levinson wrote: