Re: [xacml] A different approach to issue 66

It was a while since I read the WS-XACML draft, but what you say rings a
bell. If it's already there, that's even better. :-)

/Erik

Hal Lockhart wrote:
> I thought we could do this with WS-XACML.  It many need some more explicit conventions, but the ability to specify vocabularies is already there.
>
> The missing Attributes approach always was sort of crude. Only useful for certain use cases, such as reauthentication with a stronger method.
>
> Hal
>
>

>>