I we forgot to discuss this issue during the call. I agree that this is
a typo. We should call this new identifier "...:data-type:..." like all
other data types. I am updating the errata and the next 3.0 core draft.
Best regards,
Erik
Craig Forster wrote:
> There's also a typo in the errata regarding the dayTimeDuration and
> yearMonthDuration DataType URIs.
>
> In section A.3.7 (page 111) the DataTypes are incorrectly given as
> "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:data-types:..." - note the plural
> "data-types". Every other data type, and every other reference to the new
> duration types have "data-type" in the singular.
>
> Regards,
> Craig
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Craig Forster
> Software Engineer
> IBM Australia Development Labs
> Argus == https://w3.webahead.ibm.com/w3ki/display/commonauthz/Home
> Blog == http://blogs.tap.ibm.com/weblogs/craigforster/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> From: "Rich.Levinson" <>
>
> To: Craig Forster/Australia/IBM@IBMAU
>
> Cc: XACML TC <>
>
> Date: 02/05/2008 12:23
>
> Subject: Re: [xacml] Updating XACML 2.0 conformance tests to meet errata
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Since you are looking at the conformance tests, I was wondering if you
> could check out this request that came in the comments list - see attached
> email.
>
> The first suggestion looks like a simple errata fix, but I looked at the
> 2nd
> and it has to do with the order of the arguments. It wasn't clear to me
> that
> the order was wrong (i.e. the writer says that first and second should be
> switched in core spec based on what he sees in conf tests.)
>
> In any event, only suggesting if you have time and are already familiar
> with the tests the writer is referring to, i.e. quick check if writer is
> correct
> and core spec needs errata, and if so we can submit as issue to handle
> by editors.
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
> Craig Forster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've gone ahead and updated the conformance tests for the
> dayTimeDuration
> and yearMonthDuration DataType changes ONLY. The attached
> .ziparchive file
> includes only the files that have changed.
>
> (See attached file: conformance-updates.ziparchive)
>
> Here is a list of the changed files:
>
> conformance/policy/IIC102Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC103Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC104Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC105Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC106Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC107Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC150Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC151Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC152Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC153Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC154Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC155Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC156Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC157Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC231Policy.xml
> conformance/policy/IIC232Policy.xml
> conformance/request/IIC150Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC151Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC152Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC153Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC154Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC155Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC156Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC157Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC231Request.xml
> conformance/request/IIC232Request.xml
>
> Regards,
> Craig
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Craig Forster
> Software Engineer
> IBM Australia Development Labs
> Argus == https://w3.webahead.ibm.com/w3ki/display/commonauthz/Home
> Blog == http://blogs.tap.ibm.com/weblogs/craigforster/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> From: Craig Forster/Australia/IBM@IBMAU
>
>
> To: XACML TC <>
>
>
> Date: 01/05/2008 09:58
>
>
> Subject: [xacml] Updating XACML 2.0 conformance tests to meet
> errata
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Are there any plans to update the XACML 2.0 conformance test suite to
> meet
> the errata?
>
> The primary issue that I'm seeing is the change of the
> dayTimeDuration and
> yearMonthDuration DataType URIs, for example from
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xquery-operators-20020816#dayTimeDuration"
> to
> "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:data-type:dayTimeDuration". These URI
> changes cause 16 of the conformance tests to fail.
>
> If the TC approves, I'm more than happy to update the conformance
> tests
> myself.
>
> Regards,
> Craig
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Craig Forster
> Software Engineer
> IBM Australia Development Labs
> Argus == https://w3.webahead.ibm.com/w3ki/display/commonauthz/Home
> Blog == http://blogs.tap.ibm.com/weblogs/craigforster/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
> in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
> in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
> ----- Message from Oleg Gryb <> on Sun, 27 Apr 2008
> 23:04:48 -0700 (PDT) -----
>
> To:
>
> Subject: [xacml-comment] XACML 2.0:
> Discrepancies
>
>
>
> Please take a look, I think it needs to be fixed in
> errata ...
>
> 1.Page 70:
> “urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:resource:resource-id”
>
> Everywhere else the URI for resource-id is:
> urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:resource:resource-id
>
> 2. Please also check the definitions of
> xpath-node-equal and xpath-node-match functions at
> page 126. I got an impression from examples and
> conformance tests that the "first" and "second"
> arguments are swithced. The correct description for
> xpath-node-equal:
>
> This function SHALL take two
> “http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string” arguments,
> which SHALL be interpreted as XPath expressions, and
> SHALL return an
> “http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean”. The
> function SHALL return "True" if any
> of the XML nodes in the node-set matched by the SECOND
> argument equals, according to the
> “op:node-equal” function [XF Section 13.1.6], any of
> the XML nodes in the node-set
> matched by the FIRST argument.
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
> --
> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> OASIS eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) TC.
>
> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> before posting.
>
> Subscribe:
> Unsubscribe:
> List help:
> List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-comment/
> Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
> Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
