On 6/16/06, seth proctor <> wrote:
> So, is the common case that we want these components connected as-is, or
> based on the URI scheme that's being used? I'm not sure I know the
> answer, since very few people have given feedback about how this would
> get used in policies. I do know that strings are simple to work with,
> and will ultimately support a more flexible set of functionality. Based
> on this, and the fact that string semantics are what was originally
> defined, I think that's the best thing to use for now.
>
>
> seth
i agree with this statement.
argyn
