[Fwd: [xacml] Re: XACML Policy Model]

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: [Fwd: [xacml] Re: XACML Policy Model]




From: Anne Anderson <>
To: xacml <>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:57:30 -0500






Colleagues,

Bill Parducci suggested that this response describing the formal XACML 
policy model (not the formal semantics of the language) might be good to 
add to our TC FAQ.  What is the consensus of the group?  If we decide to 
add it, what corrections or improvements should be made?  Can we go 
further and say XACML is basically a 1st order logic language?

Regards,
Anne
-- 
Anne H. Anderson               
Sun Microsystems Labs          1-781-442-0928
Burlington, MA USA