← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

[Fwd: [xacml-users] SAML statement extension for XACML]

From
Anne Anderson <>
Date
2005-09-26T18:15:00+00:00
ID
Thread
[Fwd: [xacml-users] SAML statement extension for XACML]
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: [Fwd: [xacml-users] SAML statement extension for XACML]




From: Anne Anderson <>
To: OASIS XACML TC <>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:14:45 -0400






XML experts:

Is a substitutionGroup actually needed in order for instances of
XACMLAuthzDecisionStatement and XACMLPolicyStatement to be included in a
SAML Assertion?  Both are defined as extensions of SAML
StatementAbstractType, which is "abstract".  SAML Assertion includes
Statement as one of the inclusion choices, and Statement is also defined
as type StatementAbstractType, but it does indeed seem that does not
allow something else that is StatementAbstractType to be included in an
Assertion.

Do we need to get the SSTC to define a SAML substitutionGroup for
Statement?  It was certainly their intention to allow us to define such
extensions.  I have forwarded this to Eve Maler.

Anne
-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: 
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread