Re: [xacml] RE: 2.0 draft 13 comments

From
Seth Proctor <>
Date
2004-08-27T20:11:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml] RE: 2.0 draft 13 comments
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] RE: 2.0 draft 13 comments




From: Seth Proctor <>
To: Tim Moses <>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:11:18 -0400








> Seth - The reason that the core spec. commonly qualifies 
> <AttributeValue>
> with the "xacml:" namespace is that <AttributeValue> is defined 
> separately
> and differently in both the xacml and xacml-context namespaces.  So, I
> suggest rejecting your comment on Section 7.3.  Let me know if you 
> disagree.
> All the best.  Tim.

Ah. That does explain in. Thanks. In that case I would consider 
prefixing the rest of the elements, just so others don't get confused 
too (unless this is just another case of my being more confused than 
average <g>).


seth