← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
[xacml] Scope for hierarchical resource
Let me clarify my comments on hierarchical resource. >Tim: But what if document treated one way in policy, but request > submitted other way. resource identifier would identify as a > single resource or as a structured document. I am assuming that the semantics of the resource identifier may vary from application to application. I think it is up to the contract (agreement) between PEP and PDP and difficult to enforce syntactical restriction on URI to distinguish single resource from a structured resource as a standard. Please correct me if I am wrong. For example, an access to a file is considered as an access to a single resource. An access to one element in a XML document is also considered as an access to a single resource. On the other hand, access to an entire directory and an access to a subtree (i.e. elements and attributes) in XML document is not considered as a single resource access. One way to tell XACML policy engine about this distinction is to use scope attribute in the request. If the request specify decendant as a scope, there needs some way to address target resource hierarchical structure otherwise the engine cannot know the decendants. Best, Michiharu
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →