RE: [xacml] Type-is-in should be a match function

On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 11:03, Tim Moses wrote:
> Seth - No.  You aren't answering the wrong question.  This is what I hear
> ...
> 
> If the context contains a multi-valued attribute and, in the Target, we want
> to match on any one of the values, then we use type-equal, and not
> type-is-in.  Thereby hiding the fact that the attribute is multi-valued and
> the designator is a bag.

That's right.

> It was my misunderstanding.  Thanks for helping me out.  All the best.  Tim.

Glad I could help :)


seth