Seth - But ...
Target can contain a match function, e.g. ResourceMatch, which compares an
attributeValue with a ResourceAttributeDesignator, which is a bag of base
types.
No?
All the best. Tim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Seth Proctor [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:17 AM
To: Tim Moses
Cc: 'XACML'
Subject: Re: [xacml] Type-is-in should be a match function
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 09:16, Tim Moses wrote:
> Colleagues - Section 7.5 lists the xacml functions that qualify as a
> match function. I believe type-is-in has the necessary qualifications
> and should be included in the list. Any thoughts? All the best.
> Tim.
The type-is-in functions cannot be used in a Target's MatchId, since you're
not evaluating over a bag, but between two base types. In fact, none of the
bag functions may be used in a Target match.
seth
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.p
hp.
