← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: XACML extensions to SAML. Scott Cantor response

From
Anne Anderson <>
Date
2004-07-30T17:41:45+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: XACML extensions to SAML. Scott Cantor response
> The XACML <Status> can be different for each XACML <Result> that
> is returned, since they are evaluated independently by the PDP.

Thanks, that's what I was missing. The same issues come up when tunnelling
an application through SOAP, which also can't easily represent multiple
status values for different actions. And the solution (tunnelling) is
suboptimal in both cases, but probably unavoidable.

> It seems to me that the SAML Status for an XACML Response could
> be one of two values:
> 
>   No errors occurred
>   At least one error occurred

The SAML Status must be the URI for Success if an assertion is successfully
returned, although a subcode could be created in your profile that reflects
more precisely what's in the assertion.

-- Scott
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →