is the scope of this the entire RC or a specific rule (from which it is evoked)?
seems that something important enough to be declared must-be-present should
have some sort of context constraint...?
b
Tim Moses wrote:
> Colleagues - If we are to retain the function "present", how about this as a
> definition?
>
> urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present
>
> This function SHALL take one argument of data-type
> "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI" and SHALL return a
> "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean". The return value SHALL be
> "True" if there exists anywhere in the request context an attribute with an
> attributeId attribute whose value is the same as that of the function
> argument, according to the
> urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:anyURI-equal function. Otherwise, it
> SHALL return "False".
>
> What do you think?
>
> All the best. Tim.
