Seth - That's pretty much what I thought. So, I'll remove it. All the
best. Tim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Seth Proctor [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 4:44 PM
To: Tim Moses
Cc: 'XACML'
Subject: Re: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:18, Tim Moses wrote:
> Colleagues - We list the function
> "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present" as "mandatory" in the
> conformance section. But, I can't see a definition for it. Can
> anyone explain? All the best. Tim.
Late into the 1.0 work there was a present function for determining if a
value was present, but the semantics got too confused so we trashed it and
instead created the MustBePresent attribute on Designators and Selectors. I
suspect it's just a mistake that the attribute was left in. I suggest it
should be removed.
seth
