MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Minutes of 20 May 2004 XACML Focus Group
From: "Daniel Engovatov" <>
To: <>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:37:33 -0700
I actually think that "being named in only one way" should be out of our
scope. That is a rather heavy requirement to impose on a system, one
that requires users to come up with mapping. In the same time, it does
not buy
You much more in terms of expressiveness for the hierarchical policy.
It seems a little bit ambitious to try to define a universal naming
scheme, especially when it is not generally needed: for
interoperability it is no harder to use some particular naming
convention for hierarchy, - one has to use "some" naming convention in
any new system anyway.
I would think imposing some mandatory format for the identifier is, how
would they say - "unduly burdensome" :)
Daniel.
