Re: [xacml] XACML names

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] XACML names




From: Anne Anderson <>
To: Tim Moses <>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:44:15 -0400






I recommend grandfathering.  If we were starting a new draft, I
would say consider the new naming format, but we (you) have a lot
of work invested in our current draft, and I don't think it helps
clarity or anything else to change the names just to fit the new
naming guidelines.

Anne

On 17 May, Tim Moses writes: [xacml] XACML names
 > From: Tim Moses <>
 > To: 'XACML' <>
 > Subject: [xacml] XACML names
 > Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:37:51 -0400
 > 
 > Colleagues - I am looking at XACML names in light of the OASIS naming
 > guidelines.  
 > 
 > For instances, the schema namespace should change from
 > 
 > urn:oasis:xacml:2.0:policy:schema:os
 > 
 > to
 > 
 > urn:oasis:xacml:policy:schema:2.0:os
 > 
 > Similar changes would be required to the function, attribute and data-type
 > identifiers.
 > 
 > These changes seem rather radical.  Perhaps, we should invoke the
 > "grandfather" clause, and stick to our existing naming scheme.  What do
 > people think?
 > 
 > All the best.  Tim.
 > 
 > -----------------------------------------------------------------
 > Tim Moses
 > 613.270.3183
 > 
 > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php.
 > 

-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: 
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692